What is a Rebuttal in Debate?

 A rebuttal is a part of a debate where a speaker responds directly to the arguments made by the opposing team .

The goal is to prove that the opponent's arguments are wrong, weak, or less important than your own.

Purpose of a Rebuttal

  1. Refute the other team's points.

  2. Defend your team's arguments.

  3. Show logical flaws or lack of evidence in the opponent's case.

  4. Persuade the judges that your side is stronger and more reasonable.

How to Structure a Rebuttal

A simple and effective structure is the “Four-Step Method” :

StepDescriptionExample
1️⃣ They said...Summarize what the opponent argued.“The opposition says that social media reduces productivity.”
2️⃣ But...State why that argument is wrong or weak.“But they didn't provide any credible data to support this.”
3️⃣ Our response...Provide your counter-argument or evidence."In fact, studies from Harvard (2023) show that social media can enhance collaboration in online learning."
4️⃣ Therefore...Conclude why your side is still stronger.“Therefore, their claims about productivity loss are unconvincing.”





Tips for a Strong Rebuttal

  • Listen carefully to the other side's arguments.

  • Take notes during their speeches.

  • Use evidence or logic — don't just say “that's wrong.”

  • Stay calm and polite , even when you disagree.

  • Connect back to your team's main arguments.


Example of a Short Rebuttal

"The opposition argues that online learning is ineffective because students get distracted.
However, this is not entirely true — distraction occurs in both online and offline settings.
Research by Cambridge University (2022) shows that with proper time management, online learners can achieve equal or better results.
Therefore, their claim that online learning is ineffective is not supported by evidence."


Motion  

This House believes that Indonesia should implement a two-term limit for members of the House of Representatives.

This House would allow public voting to recall underperforming regional leaders

This House supports the relocation of Indonesia's capital to Nusantara as a step toward equitable development.

This House regrets the growing influence of political dynasties in Indonesia.

This House believes that Indonesia should prioritize political education in schools to strengthen democracy.


 

Share:

Langkah-Langkah Mengembangkan Video/Multimedia Interaktif


 1. Analyze

 The analysis stage is conducted to understand the learning needs and characteristics of students. The analysis includes: learning objectives, student characteristics, suitable materials to be developed, and media usage conditions. This stage ensures that the media is relevant and effective for the specific learning context (Branch, 2009). 

2. Design 

This stage includes storyboarding and multimedia presentation planning. The design includes slide sequences, text, images, audio, and navigation buttons such as "Next," "Back," and "Main Menu." Colors, fonts, and visual elements are arranged based on the multimedia design principles proposed by Mayer (2021). 

3. Development 

At this stage, the design is transformed into a tangible product using software such as PowerPoint, Canva, or Articulate Storyline. Interactive elements, audio narration, video, and quizzes are added. Once completed, check the functionality of buttons and animations, then export it to video format (.MP4) for widespread use. 

4. Implementation 

Products are piloted with students to determine effectiveness and ease of use. Teachers or researchers observe how students interact with the media and gather feedback for improvement.

5. Evaluation 

Evaluation takes two forms: formative and summative. Formative evaluation is conducted during development through testing by material experts, media experts, and student trials. Summative evaluation is conducted after implementation to assess the media's effectiveness in improving learning outcomes (Tessmer, 1993). 

Reference 

Branch, R. M. (2009). *Instructional design: The ADDIE approach.* Springer. 

Mayer, R.E. (2021). *Multimedia learning* (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 

Tessmer, M. (1993). *Planning and conducting formative evaluations: Improving the quality of education and training.* Kogan Page.


 

 Task

The findings indicate that respondents desire authentic, situation-based materials relevant to tourism industry practices. They stated that learning connected to real-world contexts, particularly at tourist attractions, can improve their communication skills, confidence, and preparation for employment in the tourism sector.



Share:

Mengidentifikasi Fallacies


Fallacies (kesesatan berpikir)
adalah kesalahan dalam penalaran atau logika yang membuat sebuah argumen jadi lemah, walaupun kelihatan meyakinkan.

Jenis-jenis Fallacies yang Umum

  1. Ad Hominem → Menyerang pribadi lawan, bukan argumennya.
    “Kamu tidak mungkin benar karena kamu bukan guru.”

  2. Straw Man → Memelintir argumen lawan agar mudah diserang.
    “Dia bilang kita harus gunakan teknologi, jadi dia mau semua guru diganti robot.”

  3. Hasty Generalization (Generalisasi terburu-buru) → Menarik kesimpulan dari bukti yang terlalu sedikit.
    “Dua siswa gagal ujian online, berarti sistem e-learning tidak berguna.”

  4. Appeal to Authority (Bandwagon/otoritas palsu) → Menganggap sesuatu benar hanya karena tokoh terkenal mengatakannya.
    “Artis X bilang minum kopi ini bikin pintar, pasti benar.”

  5. Appeal to Popularity (Argumentum ad populum) → Menganggap benar karena banyak orang percaya.
    “Semua orang pakai metode ini, jadi pasti yang terbaik.”

  6. False Cause (Post hoc) → Mengira sesuatu menyebabkan hal lain hanya karena terjadi berurutan.
    “Saya belajar pakai laptop, lalu nilai saya naik. Jadi laptop penyebabnya.”

  7. Slippery Slope → Menganggap satu langkah kecil pasti akan berakhir pada akibat ekstrem.
    “Kalau siswa dibiarkan pakai HP di kelas, nanti mereka tidak akan belajar sama sekali.”


Langkah Mengidentifikasi Fallacies

  1. Periksa klaim utama → Apakah klaim relevan dan jelas?

  2. Analisis alasan → Apakah alasan mendukung klaim dengan logis?

  3. Evaluasi evidence → Apakah bukti sesuai, cukup, dan tidak dipelintir?

  4. Cari pola kesalahan logis → Misalnya generalisasi berlebihan, menyerang pribadi, atau hanya mengikuti mayoritas.

  5. Bandingkan dengan standar argumen sehat → Harus konsisten, relevan, dan berbasis bukti.

Share:

Asking and Giving Information

 

Asking for Information

  • What is …?

  • Could you tell me…?

  • Do you know…?

  • Can you explain…?

  • Where is …?

  • When is …?

  • How does … work?

  • Why is …?

  • Who is …?

  • What do you mean by …?

  • Could you give me more details about …?

  • I'd like to know …

  • Do you have any ideas about …?

  • Can you show me…?

  • May I ask…?


Giving Information

  • It is …

  • This is called …

  • That means …

  • It's located in …

  • It happened on …

  • The reason is …

  • He/She is …

  • You can find it at …

  • Let me explain…

  • What I know is…

  • According to …

  • The answer is …

  • You should know that…

  • Actually, …

  • In other words, …


sample conversation

Anna: Excuse me, can you tell me where the library is?
Tom: Sure. The library is next to the main hall, just across from the cafeteria.

Anna: Oh, I see. And what time does it usually open?
Tom: It opens at 8 a.m. and closes at 5 p.m.

Anna: Great! Do you know if students can borrow books?
Tom: Yes, of course. You can borrow up to three books for one week.

Anna: Thank you for the information.
Tom: You’re welcome.



Share:

Learning Application

 There are many application serve to improve our English skills

  1. Edmodo 
  2. Moodle Mobile 
  3. Coursera / Udemy
  4. Duolingo 
  5. Busuu 
  6. Babbel 
  7. Hello English 
  8. Memrise 
  9. LingQ 
  10. BBC Learning English 
  11. Cake: Learn English 
  12. HelloTalk 
  13. EWA English 
  14. Rosetta Stone 
  15. English Club 
  16. ABA English 
  17. Cambly 
  18. Tandem 
Please make group consist of 2 people and choose one application, and analysis it and present next meeting. create good PowerPoint. each group have 15 minutes and all must speak clear.

Categories analysis:
introduction application
strangeness
weakness  
give sample learning how to study English (practice)
conclusion 
collect your work to the task and link PPT share in comment 

Share:

Video

Popular Posts

Pageviews

Search This Blog

Sample Text

What is a Rebuttal in Debate?